Affordable housing eluding more Australians

Single mother Cassandra is desperate to stay in the three-bedroom home she rents with her two school-aged children.

The 36-year-old became homeless after fleeing domestic violence and spent five years moving from refuges to emergency accommodation and transitional housing.

She has now lived in the same place for more than three years in Melbourne’s outer east, a rental that “means everything” to her.

But working one day a week, Cassandra is doing it tough.

“The rent only increases once a year, but my income’s not increasing,” she told AAP.

“After paying the rent there’s very, very little left over at the end of the week.”

Struggles like Cassandra’s are caused by an ever-rising gap between house prices and wages, low-income housing peak body National Shelter says.

The organisation, which represents homeless and community housing bodies, is calling on the federal government to build a minimum of 220,000 affordable new dwellings by 2020 under government and private-sector programs, double the current target.

Ahead of the federal election, National Shelter’s chair Adrian Pisarski on Tuesday launched a policy to address what it describes as one of the nation’s most serious problems.

“There’s over a million Australians in housing stress - that problem needs a plan to fix it,” Mr Pisarski told reporters.

The current tax system penalises low-income earners navigating the housing market, he says.

“The tax system distorts the Australian housing market away from being accessible by low- and moderate-income folk and towards people who already have some property and a high income.”

National Shelter is calling for capital gains tax exemptions on higher priced owner-occupied housing and tapering off negative gearing.

It also wants a strategy to community-managed indigenous housing and proposes that the office of federal housing minister be elevated to cabinet level.

Australian Council of Social Services (ACOSS) chief executive and former NT chief minister Clare Martin told the launch in Melbourne many poorer people face numerous barriers, including long-term unemployment or survival on minimum wages.

“If you’re on a low income and you’re living in private rental, that’s when the struggle really hits,” Ms Martin said.

The federal government’s National Housing Supply Council has identified a shortfall of 251,000 rental properties in Australia.

AAP

Filed Under: Consumer

3 Comments

Bill November 27, 2009

Tapering off negative gearing. What a statement there as most real estate investments in Australia are negatively geared, that may be an issue as quite a few of these investors are not wealthy and count on the negative gearing benefits to live. I have a better idea, why doesn’t the government release more land to meet our growing population demands and then let natural supply & demand economics bring down rent. What’s driving home prices and rent up now besides the natural fear and greed cycles is a severe shortage of housing. I for one don’t want government spending more (which leads to then taxing more) if there is a viable option. Release the land and build build build….

Melb Broker November 27, 2009

The problem with build build build is the taxpayer and purchasers will get slugged slugged slugged. Who do you think has to pay for the infrastructure. The VIC govt is already charging levies to developers. The Govt is treading a very fine line in land release against home requirements. It makes sence to try to maximise existing infrasructure that is already in the burbs. The Banks need to release funds to the developers to build apartments. It works and works well. Europe has it working in their cities, and so does the US. There is absolutely no reason it wont work here in AUS.

Tony November 27, 2009

Sounds like a wonderful “short sighted” solution to me. If the National Housing Supply Council has already identified an Australia wide shortfall of 251,000 rental properties, then how will tapering off negative gearing improve this situation? Surely, if there is less incentive for investors to buy or build investment properties, then there will be less rental properties available and supply/demand pressures will lead to further rent increases. This is “typical, anti-investor, do-gooder” sentiment. Wake up and smell the roses!

RSS Feed for This PostPost a Comment