High interest rate “ridiculous”, economist

The Reserve Bank of Australia (RBA) will begin raising interest rates from December, although they are unlikely to go higher than five per cent over the next economic cycle, an economist says.

Kinetic Securities chief economist Clifford Bennett says the RBA will raise the cash rate in December from its current three per cent - a 49-year low, but will not take it above five per cent for the next five to 15 years.

“All along we’ve had the view it will be a touch-and-go economic slowdown in Australia, with China and Australia being the first economies in the world to rebound,” Mr Bennett told AAP.

“And we’re seeing that.

“We live in a new economy where competitive price pressures are very strong and monetary policy plays a lesser role in controlling inflation than it once did.”

Mr Bennett forecast that the RBA would begin its new rate lifting cycle with a 25 basis point rise in December, followed by a 50 basis point increase in the March quarter of 2010.

Mr Bennett criticised the RBA for raising rates to “ridiculous and completely unnecessary levels” in the 2007/08 financial year.

The cash rate was last lifted by the RBA in March 2008, from seven to 7.25 per cent.

“It is hoped that the RBA will understand it does not have to overdo this tightening cycle and make the same mistakes it made previously,” Mr Bennett said in a research note published this week.

“Those (final three) rate hikes were in fact risking a recession we did not have to have.

“This was when all the major banks were calling for even higher rates.”

The cash rate has stood for the past three months at three per cent, following a series of cuts between September last year and April.

Mr Bennett said recent comments from RBA governor Glenn Stevens confirmed his view that the central bank would start lifting rates before the end of calendar 2009.

In a speech at a charity function on Tuesday, Mr Stevens said Australia had navigated the global financial crisis better than most of its industrialised peers.

He said challenges remained, particularly to ensure that the growing demand for housing finance translated to more dwellings being built rather than higher house prices.

“It appears at this stage, however, that the downturn we are having may turn out not to be one of the more serious ones of the post-War era, in contrast to the experiences of so many other countries,” Mr Stevens said.

Mr Stevens indicated the RBA would not be deterred from raising rates if unemployment, which stands at 5.8 per cent, continued to rise.

Mr Bennett said the RBA must remain aware of the risks of rising rates too high.

“As I argued in the previous tightening cycle, it is the true competitive pricing pressures of the modern economy that will contain inflation,” he said.

“It is important that all central banks, particularly the RBA, which has a propensity to overtighten, to take on board the new realities of the modern economy.”

AAP

5 Comments

Xerxes August 3, 2009

Wow, that’s a gutsy call. I guess it is this sort of sentiment that is driving up swap rates and fixed rate pricing. 75 basis points increase by March 2010. I’d be very surprised if this happens.

I understand Stevens said words to the effect of; the RBA would not rule out rate rises whilst unemployment was rising.

However RBA’s words are more about sending a warning shot/gamesmanship than anything else.

An RBA govenor talking about lifting rates whilst unemployment is rising is one thing. It is altogether a different thing him actually doing it. I can’t see it happening myself. Rates on hold for 9 - 12 months more likely.

Peter B August 3, 2009

Xerxes - agree with your comments. Also, house prices in the UK & USA are said to be now on the increase & the Financial Institutions in those countries now appear to stable. Will we now see a lowering of the “funding premium” that Institutions have been complaining about (here & O’seas) - or will it continue….. after all bottom line is paramount (especially as some Bank’s have so graciously reduced their overdrawing fees recently).

Brian D August 3, 2009

Where has this twit come from. Out of thousands of self proclaimed economic gurus only a couple have predicetd current global economic crisis.For this guy to claim that cash rates will not go above 5% over next five to fifteen years is total rubbish. I am surprised that Lending Central gives these sort of people time & space. Governor Stevens could not & would not predict whether the rate will go up or down next month or next quarter. This is the guy with all the info at his disposal & yet this guy comes up with these ridiculous predictions. I suppose they have to justify their existence somehow.

Xerxes August 3, 2009

Brian,

I was focused more on the short term rises he predicts but overlooked the obvious long term predictions you point out.

I agree his long term predictions are more adventurous than his short term predictions. Cash rates to stay below 5% in the next 15 years. Almost impossible to imagine this prediction would come true.

I do like his sentiment though. Monetary policy is a very blunt instrument to control inflation and GDP. I’d prefer longer term if the RBA sat in a neutral position and only eased moderately & raised moderately when obvious trends emerged.

However I do like to see an economist not sit on the fence and make a call. If only to see how inaccurate history shows them to be. I checked their website, where their were a number of big claims about market predictions (including: Clifford Bennett has been ranked “the world’s most accurate currency forecaster” by Bloomberg News New York)

broker in the burbs August 3, 2009

Brian, when you’re right, you’re right.

Anyone with a bit of economics training, can forecast trends over 5 or 10 years and more often than not, get the big picture reasonably right. But they can’t forecast every variable or worse, factor x. They can’t predict the economic effects of unknown future business failures or political influences, or of climactic conditions or a thousand & one other things.

Factor X is simply unknown.

You can’t put it into any forecasts because, by definition, it isn’t known until it’s happened. The GFC, precipitated by the sub prime mortgage farce in the US, was why most economic modelling was no better a predictor than my sons ‘play doh’ approach. Unless you’ve got a pretty good crystal ball and have got your tarot card CE points up, you’re always up that proverbial creek, when it all goes wrong..

But amazingly, everyone listens to ‘em like they are all knowing sages.

They get it wrong time & time again but continue to stand up in their expensive suits and rabbit on with their eco babble and hope like hell that most of us don’t remember what they’ve said a year or so down the track.

1 Trackback(s)

RSS Feed for This PostPost a Comment