Home owner grant should be scrapped - housing group

A national affordable housing organisation has called on the federal government to scrap its first home owner grant.

The grant, which was raised from $7,000 to $14,000 for existing dwellings and from $14,000 to $21,000 for new homes as part of Labor’s $10.4 billion stimulus package last year, is due to expire on June 30.

The National Shelter has called on Treasurer Wayne Swan to axe the scheme when he hands down his second budget on Tuesday, saying it inflates housing prices beyond the value of the grant.

“We’d be in favour of getting rid of all of it,” chief executive Adrian Pisarski told ABC Radio on Monday, adding if the scheme was continued, it should be means-tested.

“That actually targets those lower-income families who really struggle to get into the housing market and doesn’t advantage wealthy families who can support their kids into the market at the cost of those lower income families.”

But the Master Builders Association says the enhanced scheme should be kept as it is, minimising the effects of the global financial crisis.

“We put to the government that … the best bang for the taxpayers’ buck would come from keeping the boost for new housing,” chief executive Wilhelm Harnisch said.

“It does generate new activity, it does generate jobs, it also has the multiply effect into retail, manufacturing and other sectors.”

AAP

5 Comments

Billy May 11, 2009

No doubting the inflationary effect of the grant. All the competing bidders simply bid up the price by the amount of the grant. Only people who win are the real estate agents. May just be contributing to keeping the bubble inflated. The spike in new home owner loans only indicates that existing demand has been brought forward, rather than substantial new demand being created. No chance of it being scrapped though - looks like something is being ‘done’ - hollowman style.

Bill May 11, 2009

Typical, government spending where it shouldn’t be. We’ll all pay for it in the end, literally with higher taxes or lower services. I do agree though in principle with the MBA comment because there is a shortage of affordable housing and the government should be able to come up with a solution to build more housing either via a means tested FHOG new construction grant or short term grants to builders until the housing shortfall is met. That’s my opinion and I’m sticking to it!

pLuCk@ May 11, 2009

It was the grant that contributed to the crisis, without it people would have to consider before purchasing or budget more properly coming up with genuine deposit rather than relying on the grant itself, and potentially without it, housing could be more affordable… and the goverment should do more with land releases to ease the prices of land in NSW. Maybe tax concession would have been better for all before…

BBB May 11, 2009

What a niave comments , the banks and LMI’S are regulating the applications with 3 or 5% genuine savings and 90% LVR , that has put a lot of people out of th race, modify the scheme by giving those who chose to build a greater incentive but do not drop it

Apostille May 12, 2009

Good information about Housing Group.

RSS Feed for This PostPost a Comment