Bonus payments saw only moderate pre-Xmas spending
The federal government’s $10.4 billion economic stimulus package delivered late last year resulted in only a moderate increase in Christmas spending, a new survey reveals.
The findings add weight to the federal opposition’s call for any future package to focus on jobs and tax cuts, rather than one-off payments to families, pensioners and carers.
Research by the Australian National Retailers Association (ANRA), released on Thursday, shows people weren’t prepared to spend December’s windfall payments in one go.
Instead they used the extra cash to retire debt and ease cost of living pressures.
ANRA chief executive Margy Osmond says consumers are in no mood to spend up big in 2009.
“Gloomy forecasts and the threat of job losses have made Australians wary,” Ms Osmond said in a statement.
“As the government contemplates another stimulus package, the early evidence is that consumers will not spend windfalls in one big bang.”
The latest survey shows mortgage holders spent more of December’s bonus on Christmas presents and shopping than they’d expected to, but most of the stimulus package still went towards retiring debt.
In October, 20 per cent of Australians said they would use the handouts to pay off their mortgages.
But in January, just seven per cent said that’s what they actually did.
Sixteen per cent or respondents said they’d used the bonus on Christmas gifts, up from the nine per cent who expected to do that in October.
Nevertheless, Ms Osmond says homeowners aren’t reducing the amount of their mortgage repayments despite cuts in interest rates.
“Three quarters of mortgage holders are trying to reduce their loan more quickly by maintaining higher levels of repayment,” she said.
“Even those mortgage holders who are taking advantage of lower interest rates by reducing their payments are being cautious, using that spare cash to retire debt or help with living expenses.”
Treasurer Wayne Swan insists the bonus payments weren’t wasted.
“The economic stimulus package we brought in prior to Christmas has been absolutely essential to support Australian growth, to support Australian jobs and to support Australian business,” he said on Wednesday.
Business has backed the opposition’s call for another round of stimulus measures focusing on tax cuts.
“The (second) stimulatory package should focus on tax measures and infrastructure investment,” Australian Chamber of Commerce and Industry chief Greg Evans said in a statement.
“This should include bringing forward personal income tax reductions scheduled for July 2009 for immediate implementation, while the July 2010 cuts could also be brought forward by 12 months.”
The retailers association says the need for further government stimulus activity “is crystal clear”.
AAP









Paul January 23, 2009
Can anyone believe these economic incompetents gave away $10 Billion?
It’s quite stunning the stupidity of this decision.
I can see some sense in doubling of the first home owners grant. Give someone $14K if they go out and spend hundreds of thousands of dollars. This grant has a massive direct multiplier effect & it is a call to action to spend money to directly stimulate the economy, driving billions of dollars though the Australian economy.
But just dishing out a thousand here and there? It sounds like another Kev thought bubble that some staffer took seriously and all of a sudden our budget surplus is gone on a whim. I can’t wait to see what they come up with next.