MFAA: One system for credit regulation is best bet for businesses and borrowers

The Mortgage and Finance Association of Australia (MFAA) has called for the Federal Government to step up to the plate and take responsibility for all credit products and credit regulation, rather than dividing responsibility for lending and personal finance between the States and the Commonwealth.

The calls were part of the MFAA’s submission to the Federal Government on its Financial Services and Credit Reform Green Paper released by Minister for Superannuation and Corporate Law, Senator Nick Sherry earlier this month.

“The Commonwealth has an opportunity to simplify and improve the law, reduce business costs and provide better protection for consumers. This opportunity should not be missed, but can only be achieved by well considered Commonwealth legislation covering all consumer broking and lending,” said Phil Naylor, CEO of the MFAA.

“The MFAA believes that the only viable option is for the Federal Government to take control of the regulation for all credit facilities, including personal loans, mortgages and credit cards.”

The Federal Government’s Green Paper proposed three different options for regulatory reform: maintaining the status quo; regulation of all credit by the Commonwealth; and the third Option, which involves the
Commonwealth only taking control of mortgage credit, with the status quo remaining for all other credit.

“The MFAA strongly opposes any regulatory system that splits the responsibility of credit providers between the States and the Commonwealth. This will create a more complex and unworkable regulatory regime than currently exists,” said Mr Naylor.

“Instead of simplifying the system and removing complex layers of regulation, the third option put forward in the Green Paper would add an additional level of regulation, adding the hodge-podge of state laws.

“We are also vehemently opposed to the Government dumping lenders and brokers into the existing FSR regime. This would be wholly inappropriate as selling or providing credit is fundamentally different to providing or advising on investments,” said Mr Naylor.

“Instead, we would like to see a national licensing system for finance brokers as proposed by the NSW draft
Finance Broking Bill, released in November last year. We also support compulsory membership by lenders of an ASIC approved alternative dispute resolution (ADR) and the Commonwealth taking over the Uniform Consumer Credit Code regulations.

“We have been working towards a nationally consistent approach to regulation of our industry since 2002. We want a system that is workable and successfully weeds out any mortgage and finance brokers doing the wrong thing.”

4 Comments

jotoma June 30, 2008

Good to see the MFAA proactively lobbying the government on this. It will be a nightmare if compliance is required at multiple levels.

LCRaider July 1, 2008

Are the MFAA really having any influence on what the federal government is going to do. Over the years, the MFAA keeps telling us they are pushing for federal regulation, but to date….ZERO regulation.

Brett C July 2, 2008

MFAA have achieved zero regulation, because anytime we have some sort of discussion, OVER regulation is the result. We need finance itself to be regulated. This has nothing to do with brokers we dont make the rules. Sure there are some predatory private lenders. But regulating Brokers will do little to stop this. If we tell a borrower sorry we carnt help them. where do you think the client goes? To a private lender. People dont like to be told no and will go anywhere as long as the credit is available. Look at Motor Finan** Wizar* This group is repeatedly on TV and in trouble. But they are still around, and advertise heavily. Whos going to regulate them? And look at the Financial Planning industry - Regulated and notice how many ads on TV advertising Life Insurance by hotline or internet. Great advise there, really protecting the consumer ! A JOKE . Industry regulation is pushed by the banks to get rid of brokers. THATS ALL wake up people.

Jotoma July 2, 2008

I think it’s very easy to take potshots at the MFAA without having regard for the complexities of our regulatory authorities at both state and federal levels. I’m sure MFAA are lobbying as hard as possible, whether the government wants to listen is another matter. I think the various forms of lenders that have evolved (non-bank/bank/mortgage manager/broker/aggregator/sub prime/personal loans) can only complicate the issue. It’s a messy system we are dealing with as the market evolved over the past 10 years.

RSS Feed for This PostPost a Comment